| 000 | 01132naa a2200181 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | AR-LpUFIB | ||
| 005 | 20250311170237.0 | ||
| 008 | 230201nuuuu xxu r 000 0 eng d | ||
| 024 | 8 |
_aDIF-M2343 _b2430 _zDIF002242 |
|
| 040 |
_aAR-LpUFIB _bspa _cAR-LpUFIB |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aGustafson, John L. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe Scaled-Sized Model : _bA revision of Amdahl´s Law |
| 500 | _aFormato de archivo: PDF. -- Disponible también en línea (Cons. 28-04-2008) | ||
| 520 | _aA popular argument, generally attributed to Amdahl, is that vector and parallel architectures should not be carried to extremes because the scalar or serial portion of the code will eventually dominate. Since pipeline stages and extra processors obviously add hardware cost, a corollary to this argument is that the most cost-effective computer is one based on uniprocessor, scalar principles. For architectures that are both parallel and vector, the argument is compounded, making it appear that near-optimal performance on such architectures is a near-impossibility. | ||
| 650 | 4 | _aARQUITECTURAS PARALELAS | |
| 650 | 4 | _aRENDIMIENTO DE LOS SISTEMAS | |
| 942 | _cCP | ||
| 999 |
_c52138 _d52138 |
||